Difference between revisions of "Talk:License"

Revision as of 09:55, 7 November 2006

We might be pushing it by saying we strictly adhere. Perhaps a slightly softer word but still retaining the effectiveness? --Manc 18:24, 31 March 2006 (CST)

Would "oblige" be suitable? -Deathz0r 18:25, 31 March 2006 (CST)

I was thinking "diligently" or "dutifully" follows... --Manc 18:26, 31 March 2006 (CST)

I like "dutifully", "diligently" seems to be a bit too highbrow. -Deathz0r 18:28, 31 March 2006 (CST)

With all the new information on zDoom project's change to GPL willingness, just low priority, we need to update this to give that information. Additionally, as a note, it seems the same may be true for GzDoom if we need any of their resources.-- Kituskun 3:50, 7 Nov 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 09:54, 7 November 2006 (view source) KitsuKun (Talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:55, 7 November 2006 (view source) KitsuKun (Talk \| contribs) m Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I like "dutifully", "diligently" seems to be a bit too highbrow. -[[User:Deathz0r\|Deathz0r]] 18:28, 31 March 2006 (CST)		I like "dutifully", "diligently" seems to be a bit too highbrow. -[[User:Deathz0r\|Deathz0r]] 18:28, 31 March 2006 (CST)

−	With all the new information on zDoom project's change to GPL willingness, just low priority, we need to update this to give that information. Additionally, as a note, it seems the same may be true for GzDoom if we need any of their resources.-- [[~~Use~~:KitsuKun\|Kituskun]] 3:50, 7 Nov 2006 (CST)	+	With all the new information on zDoom project's change to GPL willingness, just low priority, we need to update this to give that information. Additionally, as a note, it seems the same may be true for GzDoom if we need any of their resources.-- [[User:KitsuKun\|Kituskun]] 3:50, 7 Nov 2006 (CST)