Difference between revisions of "Talk:Odamex"

Revision as of 15:29, 26 August 2012

It's a start! :O --EarthQuake 21:03, 3 April 2006 (CDT)

I feel like some of this could be cleaned up. Moreso, I think that perhaps some of the things from the FAQ, such as platforms that it runs on, could be copied over from the FAQ, and the FAQ reseved for real "frequently asked questions." Any comments? --AlexMax 01:19, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Wrong statements

"as well as the ZDoom 1.23 beta33 ACS interpretor. " This is not true. Odamex doesn't support the inventory-related ACS functions.
"Windows 95, 98, ME(?), NT(?)" It doesn't work on Windows 98 (bug 878) and probably doesn't on 95. Needs to be announced.

Revision as of 15:29, 26 August 2012 (view source) Pseudoscientist (Talk \| contribs) (→‎Wrong statements: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:29, 26 August 2012 (view source) Pseudoscientist (Talk \| contribs) m (→‎Wrong statements: Fix typo) Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	* "as well as the ZDoom 1.23 beta33 ACS interpret'''''o'''''r. " This is not true. Odamex doesn't support the inventory-related ACS functions.		* "as well as the ZDoom 1.23 beta33 ACS interpret'''''o'''''r. " This is not true. Odamex doesn't support the inventory-related ACS functions.
−	* "Windows 95, 98, ME(?), NT(?)" It doesn't work on Windows 98 ([http://odamex.net/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=878 bug 878] and probably doesn't on 95. Needs to be announced.	+	* "Windows 95, 98, ME(?), NT(?)" It doesn't work on Windows 98 ([http://odamex.net/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=878 bug 878]) and probably doesn't on 95. Needs to be announced.